Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2026 · 範疇回顧（依標題推測）
Outcome measurement instruments used in the evaluation of key psychological constructs in people with tendinopathy: A scoping review.
運動心理與心理健康 · 運動傷害心理反應
中文閱讀摘要
本範圍回顧指出肌腱病變心理量表使用高度異質，恐動症最常用但干預前後變化小，亟需標準化。
AI 依來源摘要整理，未經人工逐篇核對。閱讀結論前，請回溯研究族群、方法與限制。
原始摘要
Objective
To identify and describe the pain-related psychological outcome measurement instruments used to measure kinesiophobia, pain beliefs, pain self-efficacy and fear avoidance beliefs in tendinopathy research.
Design
Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute Framework and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline.
Literature search
Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsychINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched from inception to March 23rd, 2025, for published tendinopathy studies.
Study selection criteria
Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy that reported at least one recorded psychological outcome measurement instrument for the constructs of interest.
Data synthesis
Data were collated for study characteristics, tendon site (synonyms used), psychological construct, outcome measurement instrument type/version/frequency, cutoff scores and pre-post intervention scores.
Results
Ninety-three studies (n = 7041 participants) were included: 25 RCTs, 55 observational studies and 13 other designs. Kinesiophobia was the most frequently assessed construct (69%) using various versions of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Pain self-efficacy (21.5%) was primarily measured with the Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire; Fear avoidance beliefs (19.4%) with the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and pain beliefs (1.1%) with unvalidated instruments. Baseline kinesiophobia and fear-avoidance scores generally indicated low to moderate severity with minimal pre-post intervention change scores.
Conclusion
Considerable heterogeneity and conceptual ambiguity were identified in assessing psychological constructs in tendinopathy. These findings highlight the need for greater standardisation and consensus in outcome measurement to enhance consistency, interpretability, and clinical applicability in tendinopathy research and practice.
至 Europe PMC 閱讀完整來源 ↗ · 擷取日期 2026-10-19
書目、來源與全文狀態
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103564
- PMID／PMCID
- 42070470
- 作者
- Stubbs C, Auliffe SM, Barry-Walsh C, Chimenti RL, Mest J, O'Sullivan K, van den Akker-Scheek I, Malliaras P
- 首次發表日期
- 2026-04-30Europe PMC 提供，部分日期可能依年份或月份推定。
- 卷／期／頁碼或文章編號
- 84 ／ 期未提供 ／ 103564
- 書目來源與查核日期
- Europe PMC · 2026-10-19僅核對書目欄位與來源連結；不代表已評讀研究品質。
- 全文與授權
- 來源尚未確認免費全文。 來源授權標示：cc by。
可回溯引用
Stubbs C, Auliffe SM, Barry-Walsh C, Chimenti RL, Mest J, O'Sullivan K, van den Akker-Scheek I, Malliaras P. Outcome measurement instruments used in the evaluation of key psychological constructs in people with tendinopathy: A scoping review. Musculoskeletal science & practice. 2026;84:103564. PMID: 42070470. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103564
本站供教育與研究參考。單篇摘要、文體標籤與期刊影響係數不等於證據品質或個別病人的診療建議。